
_______________________________________________________
Artist's impression of SDSS 1035+0551. Credit: Stuart Littlefair/Science.The hot white dwarf is the same size as the Earth, yet weighs the same as our Sun. The brown dwarf is about the same size as Jupiter, but much more massive. The gravity of the white dwarf pulls gas from the brown dwarf; this gas spirals down onto the surface of the white dwarf, like water down a plughole, forming an "accretion disc" of hot gas around the white dwarf.
Where the falling gas from the brown dwarf hits the accretion disc, it creates a hot spot. The position of this hot spot depends on the masses of the two stars. The authors precisely timed when the white dwarf and hot spot were eclipsed by the brown dwarf. This allowed them to measure the location of the hot spot, and infer the masses of the two stars.
A long-standing and unverified prediction of binary star evolution theory is the existence of a population of white dwarfs accreting from substellar donor stars. Such systems ought to be common, but the difficulty of finding them, combined with the challenge of detecting the donor against the light from accretion, means that no donor star to date has a measured mass below the hydrogen burning limit.
A binary star system in which a white dwarf accretes material from a companion is called a cataclysmic variable (CV). Every kilogram of material that falls onto the white dwarf gains the energy equivalent of a few kilotons of TNT. Much of this energy is released as ultraviolet or x-ray radiation. Many CVs have been identified from this highly variable, short-wavelength light produced by rapid mass transfer onto the white dwarf.
However, most CVs should have evolved through this violent phase to become a "dead CV" with a low-mass companion that can support only weak mass transfer. Extensive efforts to confirm this long-standing prediction have failed to identify any CVs that have clearly survived the rapid mass transfer phase of their evolution. Now, a team of astronomers report in Science (see reference below) the unambiguous detection of a dead CV from a direct mass measurement of the low-mass companion in the CV SDSS 103533.03+055158.4 (SDSS 1035 for short).
A typical CV is smaller than the Sun, so there is a good chance that the orientation of the binary is such that the companion eclipses the white dwarf once every orbit as seen from Earth. This will lead to an apparent dimming of the CV every orbit during the few minutes that the companion blocks the light from the white dwarf. SDSS 1035 is an eclipsing CV, so there is a wealth of information to be gleaned from the changes in brightness during the eclipse. These show, for example, that the mass transferred from the low-mass companion forms a disc around the white dwarf with a bright spot on its outer edge due to the inflowing material.
The orbital period of SDSS 1035 is only 82 min, so small features such as the white dwarf are eclipsed in less than a minute. To accurately measure these rapid changes in brightness in such a faint star, Littlefair et al. used the William Herschel Telescope and ULTRACAM, an instrument they designed that uses CCDs to measure the brightness of CVs and other rapidly varying stars.
The data quality is impressive and leads to a mass for the companion accurate to about 4%. This is good enough to show convincingly that they are observing a genuine dead CV because the companion is well below the limit of 0.072 solar masses which a star cannot sustain nuclear reactions in its core. Objects that are born with masses below this limit are known as brown dwarfs.
Source
ING Isaac Newton Group of TelescopesULTRACAM Obtains the First Observational Evidence of a Dead Cataclysmic VariableMore information:
A Ghostly Star Revealed in Silhouette Science, 314, 1550. Pierre F. L. Maxted.
Cataclysmic Cannibals in the Sky Science Press Release, 7 December 2006_______________________________________________________
Binary Stars & Terrestial Worlds by Centauri DreamsColliding White Dwarfs could create a supergiant by Universe Today
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
Labels: Binary Stars, ING
Answering such questions is a high priority because Type Ia supernovas are major sources of iron in the Universe. Also, because of their nearly uniform intrinsic brightness, Type Ia supernova are used as important tools by scientists to study the nature of dark energy and other cosmological issues.
"Right now these supernovas are used as black boxes to measure distances and derive the rate of expansion of the universe," said Nelemans. "What we're trying to do is look inside the box."
If the supernova explosion is caused by material being pulled off a companion star onto the white dwarf, fusion of this material on the surface of the star should heat the star and produce a strong source of X-radiation prior to the explosion. Once the supernova explosion occurs, the white dwarf is expected to be completely destroyed and then would be undetectable in X-rays. In the merger scenario, the intensity of X-ray emission prior to the explosion is expected to be much weaker.
Based on the detection of a fairly strong X-ray source at approximately the position of SN 2007on 4 years before the explosion, Voss and Nelemans conclude that the data support the scenario where matter is pulled off a companion star. The small number of X-ray sources in the field implies that there is only a small chance of an unrelated source being so close by coincidence. Also, the X-ray source has similar properties to those expected for fusion on a white dwarf, unlike most X-ray sources in the sky.
However, in follow-up studies, Voss, Nelemans and colleagues Gijs Roelofs (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Mass.) and Cees Bassa (McGill University, Canada) used higher-quality optical images to better determine the supernova's position. This work, which is not yet published, shows a small, but significant difference in the measured positions of the supernova and the X-ray source, suggesting the source may not be the progenitor.
Follow-up Chandra observations hint that the X-ray object has disappeared, but further observations are needed to finally decide whether the source was the progenitor or not.
The team is also applying this new method to other supernovas and has high hopes that they will eventually succeed in identifying the elusive cause of at least some of these explosions.
"We're very excited about opening up a new way of studying supernovas, even though we're not sure that we've seen this particular stellar bomb before it exploded," said Gijs Roelofs. "We're very confident that we'll learn a lot more about these important supernovas in the future."
Voss agrees that, even if the X-ray source is not found to be the progenitor of SN 2007on, the hunt is worth the effort.
"Finding the progenitor to one of these Type Ia supernovas is a great chase in astronomy right now," he said. "These supernovas are great tools for studying dark energy, but if we knew more about how they form they might become even better tools."